The virtues of confusion We all know that confusion doesn't feel good. Because it seems like an obstacle to learning, we try to arrange educational experiences and training sessions so that learners will encounter as little confusion as possible. But as is so often the case when it comes to learning, our intuitions here are exactly wrong. Scientists have been building a body of evidence over the past few years demonstrating that confusion can lead us to learn more efficiently, more deeply, more lastingly—as long as it's properly managed.
How can this be? The human brain is a pattern-recognition machine. It evolved to identify related events or artifacts and connect them into a meaningful whole. This capacity serves us well in many endeavors, from recognizing the underlying themes in literature, to understanding the deep structure of a scientific or mathematical problem, to anticipating hidden complications and seeing their solutions in our work. Over time, exposure to these problem-solving situations gives us a subconscious familiarity with their essential nature that we can hardly articulate in words, but which we can easily put into action.
We short-circuit this process of subconscious learning, however, when we rush in too soon with an answer. It's better to allow that confused, confounded feeling to last a little longer—for two reasons. First, not knowing the single correct way to resolve a problem allows us to explore a wide variety of potential explanations, thereby giving us a deeper and broader sense of the issues involved. Second, the feeling of being confused, of not knowing what's up, creates a powerful drive to figure it out. We're motivated to look more deeply, search more vigorously for a solution, and in so doing we see and understand things we would not have, had we simply been handed the answer at the outset.
Here, three ways that researchers have deliberately induced confusion, and how you can adapt them to your own learning:
1. Expose yourself to confusing material. Reading a story by the surrealist writer Franz Kafka, or watching a movie by the eccentric filmmaker David Lynch, imposes on us a "meaning threat"—the uncomfortable feeling that nothing quite makes sense. We become motivated to find meaning
somewhere, even if not in the original story or film, and this disposition actually makes us more accurate at picking out patterns. That's the finding of Travis Proulx and Steven J. Heine, researchers who published their results in the journal
Psychological Science. If you're about to engage in any sense-making activity, from analyzing data to solving word problems, you may want to try delving into material that
doesn't make much sense first.
2. Withhold the answers from yourself. We've heard a lot lately about the benefits of experiencing and overcoming failure. One way to get these benefits is to set things up so that you're
sure to fail—by tackling a difficult problem without any instruction or assistance. Manu Kapur, a researcher at the Learning Sciences Lab at the National Institute of Education of Singapore, has reported (in the
Journal of the Learning Sciences) that people who try solving math problems in this way don't come up with the right answer—but they
do generate a lot of ideas about the nature of the problems and about what potential solutions would look like, leading them to perform better on such problems in the future. Kapur calls this "productive failure," and you can implement it in your own learning by allowing yourself to struggle with a problem for a while before seeking help or information.
3. Test yourself before you learn. It sounds crazy, but studies by Nate Kornell, a psychology professor at Williams College, and others have found that trying to answer questions about material you haven't even seen yet will help you learn that information better once you do encounter it. In an article published in the
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, Kornell and his coauthors theorize that searching our minds for answers (even if we come up empty) creates "fertile ground" in the brain for encoding the answer when it is eventually provided. You can do this yourself by flipping through a book or report you have to read and quizzing yourself on the chapter titles and section headings (many textbooks also supply lists of review questions which can be used as a pre-test). My favorite suggestion for using this technique: As you start to Google some piece of information, pause before looking at the results the search engine returns and try to come up with the answer yourself. Even if you can't do it, you'll be more likely to remember the information once it's in front of your eyes. (For abstracts of the three studies mentioned here, go to my
blog.)
(Want to read past issues of The Brilliant Report? You'll find them here.)
This Week's Top Blog PostS 1. Why The Silver Medalist Looks So Miserable
2. Firstborns Motivated To Learn, Secondborns Motivated To Win?
3. Showing Students The Beauty And Order Of The English Language
4. Men And Women On Risk And Failure
5. Against "Downton Abbey"-Style Education
6. What Is Transfer? And Why Is It So Hard To Achieve?
7. Why We Need Science: Our Intuitions About Learning Often Fail Us
8. Watch Out For The "Swiss Cheese Effect"
9. Can Your Friends Make You Smarter?
10. How To Build A Rich Vocabulary
Articles and Blog posts About . . . SPORTS And Exercise 1. Good Coaches Give A "Positive Sandwich"
2. The Mindset Of Champions
3. Contact Sports May Make Learning Harder
4. Exercise More, Make More Money?
5. What's Wrong With The Dumb Jock Stereotype
6. Are Athletes "Meatheads"—Or Smarter Than You Are?
7. Six Things We Can Learn From Olympic Athletes
8. Starting The School Day With Exercise
9. Your Body Teaches Itself How To Run
10. When To Schedule Learning: Evening Soccer, Anyone?
If you have comments or questions, I'd love to hear from you by email: annie@anniemurphypaul.com. And if you'd like to read even more about learning, you can visit my website, follow me on Twitter, and join the conversation on Facebook. Be brilliant!
All my best,

Annie |
This Week's Brilliant Quote"Research has shown that American children's love of learning declines steadily from third through ninth grade. It doesn't have to be that way. Over the past thirty years, psychologists have conducted hundreds of students that show what makes children want to learn. Their research tells us how to raise a child who is interested in academic work and even finds pleasure and joy in learning. It shows us how to raise children who seek intellectual challenges, and who plow on confidently even when the going gets tough. [What the research shows is that] we need to raise children who feel competent, autonomous, and secure in their relationships to others. Kids will be self-motivated to learn when they feel capable and skilled, and confident of becoming more so; when they have some choice and control over their learning; and when they feel loved, supported, and respected by their parents. Children who love learning also believe that intelligence isn't fixed and inborn, but that they can get smarter by working hard. The general principles [revealed by this research] apply to children of all ages, and even to adults. Everyone can engage in the self-motivating cycle of working hard, persisting to overcome obstacles, and being energized to do more by the feelings of pleasure brought on by newly gained confidence."—Deborah Stipek and Kathy Seal, Motivated Minds: Raising Children to Love Learning
|