"The Advocates for Self-Government is one of
the freedom movement's leading organizations."
â€” Ron Paul, The Congressional Record, June 30, 2010
WELCOME to the Liberator Online!
In This Issue
* Thursday, June 5, 2014: Online Liberty Campaign "Reset The Net"
* Harvard Study: Young Americans Want Far Less Interventionist Foreign Policy
* Hey, Media: "Isolationist" Is an Insult and a Lie
* Great News! The World Is Getting Better: HumanProgress.org
THEY SAID IT: Rand Paul rises in opposition.... Dr. Oz jumps on medical marijuana bandwagon â€” along with almost everyone else in America.... Please stop U.S. legalization of pot, says Mexican pot farmers now going out of business.... DIY man out-digitizes public library.... Government is killing the American dream, says Mark Cuban.... Nearly half of Americans now must beg permission from government to work.... Re-quote: Milton Friedman's classic "Four Ways to Spend Money"....
PERSUASION POWER POINT #370 by Michael Cloud
* Are You Waiting for Our Libertarian Ship to Come In?
ASK DR. RUWART by Mary Ruwart
* Who would make health decisions about children in a libertarian society: parents or medical professionals?
ONE-MINUTE LIBERTY TIP by Sharon Harris
* Word Choices: Pro-Market, Not Pro-Business
WHAT'S HAPPENING WITH THE ADVOCATES
* Upcoming: Advocates communication workshops and speeches
* FREE OPH KITS for libertarian student groups!
* Join the Advocates on Twitter
* Join the Advocates on Facebook
* 2014 Freedom Cruises
by Sharon Harris
Thursday, June 5, 2014: Online Liberty Campaign "Reset The Net"
Fed up with government surveillance spoiling the freedom and fun of the Internet? You're not alone. And now there's something you can do about it.
"Don't ask for your privacy. Take it back."
That's the theme of Reset the Net
â€” a new worldwide coalition of organizations, companies and tens of thousands of Internet users dedicated to preserving free speech and basic rights on the Internet.
They're all pledging to "Reset The Net" on Thursday, June 5th, 2014 â€” the anniversary of the first NSA surveillance story revealed by whistleblower Edward Snowden â€” by empowering Internet activists, companies and organizations to take simple steps to encrypt the web to shut out the government's mass surveillance capabilities.
And you can join them.
Organizations â€” including some of the Internet's largest and most influential â€” will participate by publicizing the effort, improving their own security and promoting free privacy tools to their followers.
Individual Internet users can act with Reset The Net in several important ways. Reset The Net will offer a free "privacy pack" of safe open-source software tools for easy encrypting of chat logs, email, phone calls and text messaging, as well as information on other ways to secure online life against intrusive surveillance.
" These super-easy encryption tools let you talk, chat, and text with pretty strong privacy," says Reset The Net. "If everyone used them, that would go a long way to shutting down mass surveillance. So, be the first. And tell your friends. In the end, beating the NSA could be that simple."
Reset The Net will offer supporters a splash screen they can run at their websites on June 5. These screens will reach millions with a call for privacy and a link to the privacy tools pack. You can also join the worldwide #ResetTheNet Twitter brigade to publicize the effort.
Information on these and other activities is at the Reset The Net website
. Watch the short video on the home page to learn more.
"The NSA is exploiting weak links in Internet security to spy on the entire world, twisting the Internet we love into something it was never meant to be," says Reset The Net. "We can't stop targeted attacks, but we can stop mass surveillance, by building proven security into the everyday Internet."
For more information â€” and more ideas on what you can do â€” watch the short ResetTheNet.org campaign video
and visit ResetTheNet.org.
And remember the date: June 5th, 2014.
* * *
The purpose of the Liberator Online is to build a stronger movement for liberty. We do this by providing information about the libertarian movement and how to best communicate the ideas of liberty. Thank you for being a part of this!
Learn more about the Advocates and our work for liberty.
Learn more about libertarianism â€” the philosophy of liberty.
Become a SUPER COMMUNICATOR for the ideas of liberty!
Learn how at an entertaining and enlightening Advocates communication workshop, led by acclaimed libertarian communication expert and Advocates President Sharon Harris.
Find out how you can get Sharon to speak at your organization. Email Sharon now, or call her at 770-386-8372.
Attendees rave about the workshop:
â€œThis workshop should be taken by every individual in the liberty movement. The practicality and content have the power to take us from a minority to a majority."
â€œA fabulous workshop for anyone interested in cultivating their communication skills (especially on liberty). Sharon Harris is a brilliant presenter.â€
Don't miss this opportunity to learn the very best tested and proven ways to win others to the ideas of liberty. More details here.
by James W. Harris
Harvard Study: Young Americans Want Far Less Interventionist Foreign Policy
Young Americans want a far less interventionist foreign policy, and they don't trust the United Nations or the federal government in general. And they have strong libertarian leanings on other key issues.
That's according to
the latest Harvard Public Opinion Project, a highly-respected national poll of America's "Millennials"(18- to 29- year-olds) by Harvard's Institute of Politics that has been conducted biannually since 2000.
The numbers are startlingly anti-interventionist. Fully 74 percent agreed with this statement: "The United States should let other countries and the United Nations take the lead in solving international crises and conflicts." Only a fourth believed that the United States "should take the lead in solving international crises and conflicts."
Fully 39 percent disagreed with the statement "it is sometimes necessary to attack potentially hostile countries, rather than waiting until we are attacked to respond." Only a tiny 16 percent agreed with that statement.
Concerning specific recent foreign policy crises, 62 percent disapproved of the president's handling of the Syria crisis, and 59 percent disapproved of the government's policies towards Iran and Ukraine.
The same skepticism applies to international bodies. Fully two-thirds said they trusted the UN only "some of the time" or "never." Only about a third of respondents said they trusted the United Nations all or most of the time.
This radical rejection of interventionism among the young is accompanied by other libertarian-friendly positions and a strong degree of skepticism towards government in general. Just three percent of Millennials reported
trusting the federal government "all of the time," while 80 percent said that they trusted it either only "some of the time" or "never." Similarly, eighty-four percent of participants felt that they could trust Congress only "some of the time" or "never." Just one-third trust the president "most" or "all of the time."
On the re-legalization of marijuana, 25- to 29- year-olds support
re-legalization by a large margin of 50 percent to 28 percent (21 percent unsure); among 18- to- 24- year-olds, 38 percent support, 39 percent oppose (22 percent unsure). Overall, 66 percent support re-legalizing marijuana for medical purposes.
On sexual tolerance, 61 percent say
that "a friend's sexual orientation is not important to me."
Finally, Millennials are moving away from identifying with either of the two older parties, with increasing numbers identifying
as Independents (38 percent) rather than Republicans (25 percent) or Democrats (37 percent).
Hey, Media: "Isolationist" Is an Insult and a Lie
"When tea party or libertarian Republicans oppose U.S. military intervention or aid in Ukraine, Syria or any other hot spot, they are regularly labeled 'isolationist' by mainstream media outlets. The same term is now commonly used to describe the growing number of war-weary Americans who believe the U.S. tries to do too much around the world militarily."
Jack Hunter, contributing editor at Rare.US, in a commentary entitled "Hey
media, 'isolationist' is not an acceptable term."
Hunter notes that the biggest hawks in America â€” liberal and conservative, Democrat and Republican â€” immediately label as "isolationist" anyone who even dares suggest that the U.S. shouldn't get involved in every local squabble around the world.
They're deliberately using that term as a smear, Hunter points out. Which is wrong, but predictable.
But it's far worse for the media to use such an inaccurate, pejorative and partisan term, he argues. Yet they're doing it.
Hunter quotes conservative pundit and National Review editor-at-large Jonah Goldberg â€” who is definitely NOT a non-interventionist â€”
from a perceptive piece Goldberg wrote
"Some reporters say that they're using 'isolationist' as a descriptive label, not as a pejorative term. This is nonsense. First of all, it simply is a pejorative term. But, if it's not a pejorative term, how come nobody ever uses it to describe liberals who often want to intervene far less than conservatives do?"
Goldberg further notes that, all in all, libertarians are far less "isolationist" than most Americans:
"Why is isolationism only about military strikes? What about trade? Immigration? If you throw that stuff into the mix, libertarians are far less isolationist than most Americans, and yet libertarians are supposedly the heart of this new isolationism. How strange."
Goldberg quotes Timothy Carney's wonderful sarcastic Ambrose Bierce-ish definition
: "Isolationist: n. Someone who, on occasion, opposes bombing foreigners."
Then Goldberg reworks that a bit: "I'd phrase it slightly different. An isolationist is someone who doesn't want to bomb foreigners when I do."
So, yeah, isolationist is a smear, and that's why the biggest Congressional interventionists use it. But the media shouldn't let them get away with it.
It's time to stop labeling opposition to 24-7 global warfare as "isolationism." And it's highly irresponsible of the media to use that term themselves, or to let hawks toss it around without challenge or comment.
Libertarians should constantly point this out. Advocates President Sharon Harris wrote a Liberty Minute column in 2011 on how to do this persuasively and effectively, and that column can be found in this
Great News! The World Is Getting Better: HumanProgress.org
There is a large and growing body of evidence showing dramatic and remarkable improvements in human well-being in recent decades, especially in the developing world.
Unfortunately, this evidence is little-known and often overlooked. Bad news and predictions of doom and gloom are disproportionately reported. Many people, including the highly educated, simply have no idea of the great and ongoing progress in many crucial areas of human life around the world.
This exciting and uplifting news deserves far more attention. HumanProgress.org
, a new website and research tool from the Cato Institute, hopes to accomplish that.
Many visitors who take the time to explore the site will be genuinely surprised by the well-documented major advances in world peace, living standards, environmental cleanliness, life spans, and much more. Crimes such as rape, hate crimes, deadly riots, and child abuse are all substantially down from the past. Around 5.1 billion people live in countries where incomes have more than doubled since 1960, and well over half the human race lives in countries where average incomes have tripled or more. Technologies unimaginable just a few years ago are now commonplace even among the world's poor.
HumanProgress.org provides tools that let users see the many documented ways in which the world has become a far better place. Over 500 data sets of human development indicators from a variety of reliable sources allow visitors to compare indicators with one another, create and share graphics, and calculate differences in human well-being between different countries over time. Visitors can explore progress in categories including: Communications, Education, Energy, Environment, Food, Gender Equality, Happiness, Health, Housing, Transportation, Violence, and Wealth.
By putting together this comprehensive data in an accessible way, HumanProgress.org provides a fantastic documented resource for scholars, journalists, students, and the general public.
For a good graph-free overview of what it's all about, go to the introductory essay
"What is Human Progress?" which presents some downright startling figures and arguments and puts them in context.
And for an easy way to keep up with breaking good news about human progress â€” and to get a regular booster shot of reasons for rational optimism â€” you can like HumanProgress.org's Facebook page
Cato hopes that HumanProgress.org will lead to a greater appreciation of the improving state of the world. Things are getting better in many areas, to a remarkable degree, and largely due to progress in markets, civil liberties and peace. That's great news! Let's spread the word.
* * * * * * * *
Intellectual Ammunition is written by Liberator Online editor James W. Harris. His articles have appeared in numerous magazines and newspapers, and he has been a Finalist for the Mencken Awards, given by the Free Press Association for "Outstanding Journalism in Support of Liberty."
THEY SAID IT...
IN OPPOSITION: "I rise today to oppose the nomination of anyone who would argue that the president has the power to kill American citizens not involved in combat. I rise today to say that there is no legal precedent for killing American citizens not directly involved in combat and that any nominee who rubber stamps and grants such power to a president is not worthy of being placed one step away from the Supreme Court. ...Are we comfortable killing American citizens, no matter how awful or heinous the crime they're accused of, are we comfortable killing them based on accusations that no jury has reviewed?" â€” Sen. Rand Paul on the Senate floor May 21, 2014, explaining his objections to nominating David Barron to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit.
DR. OZ JUMPS ON MEDICAL MARIJUANA BANDWAGON: "I grew up like most of my generation believing that marijuana was something Satan was throwing at Americans, a communist plot. But I think most of us have come around to the believe that marijuana is hugely beneficial when used correctly for medicinal purposes." â€” TV megastar Dr. Mehmet Oz on "Larry King Live," May 14, 2014. Oz is hardly alone. Earlier this year a CBS News poll found a whopping 86 percent of Americans think doctors should be able to legally prescribe medical cannabis to patients suffering from serious illnesses. Numerous other polls indicate a majority of Americans favor re-legalization for recreational use as well.
LEGAL POT KILLS BLACK MARKETS: "It's not worth it anymore. I wish the Americans would stop with this legalization." â€” Rodrigo Silla, 50, a lifelong cannabis farmer in Mexico, quoted in the Washington Post. Silla, like other Mexican pot farmers, has stopped growing marijuana because the U.S. has re-legalized marijuana or allows it for medical use in 20 states and the District of Columbia. This has gutted the market and lowered prices by 3/4s â€” exactly as libertarians predicted. Unfortunately, but also predictably, Mexican drug cartels are now pushing heroin harder than ever to make up for their pot losses. Hmmmâ€¦ how could we stop that?
DO-IT-YOURSELF: "In 2003, the Brooklyn Public Library (BPL) spent $400,000 digitizing The Brooklyn Daily Eagle, which was among the most widely read and influential papers in 19th century America. A decade later, the library was still raising money to finish the remaining 52 years of the Daily Eagle's run. In the meantime, [Tom] Tryniski digitized all 115 years of the paper in about five months working alone." â€” journalist Jim Epstein, "A Retiree Digitizes 27 Million Old Newspaper Pages in His Living Room (and Libraries Fight to Catch Up)," Reason blog, May 18, 2014.
GOV'T KILLING AMERICAN DREAM: "Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban left school with no money and no job prospects. He managed to become a billionaire by creating several businesses from scratch. I asked him if he could do it again today, and he said, 'No ... now there's so much paperwork and regulation, so many things that you have to sign up for, that you have a better chance of getting in trouble than you do of being successful.' That's tragic. â€¦ Government mostly hinders us, and then brags that it is waiting to take charge when we fail." â€” award-winning libertarian journalist John Stossel, "Regulating Away the American Dream," April 30, 2014.
GOV'T PERMISSION REQUIRED TO WORK: "At the state level, government regulation has become so lucrative for crony-capitalists that today almost 40 percent of U.S. jobs require a government license versus about 5 percent a generation ago. Louisiana requires $2,000 plus 80 hours of study to become a florist, while Utah requires hair braiders to get a beautician license that costs $18,000 and 2,000 hours of study." â€” economist Antony Davies, "Consumers Are the Best Regulators," US News & World Report online, May 12, 2014.
RE-QUOTED AND NOTED
MILTON FRIEDMAN ON FOUR WAYS TO SPEND MONEY: "There are four ways in which you can spend money. You can spend your own money on yourself. When you do that, why then you really watch out what you're doing, and you try to get the most for your money. Then you can spend your own money on somebody else. For example, I buy a birthday present for someone. Well, then I'm not so careful about the content of the present, but I'm very careful about the cost. Then, I can spend somebody else's money on myself. And if I spend somebody else's money on myself, then I'm sure going to have a good lunch! Finally, I can spend somebody else's money on somebody else. And if I spend somebody else's money on somebody else, I'm not concerned about how much it is, and I'm not concerned about what I get. And that's government. And that's close to 40% of our national income." â€” Milton Friedman, Fox News interview (May 2004), requoted by Mark D. Friedman in comments field of BleedingHeartsLibertarian.com article.
* * * * * * * * * *
"They Said It..." is compiled by Liberator Online editor James W. Harris.
Persuasion Power Point #370
by Michael Cloud
Are You Waiting for Our Libertarian Ship to Come In?
"Big Government is unsustainable," said one libertarian. "It'll collapse and that's when we'll get liberty."
"I'm part of the Remnant," said another. "Liberty is doomed...for now. My job is to quietly share libertarianism until the world is ready for liberty."
"Our tax-burdened, regulation-strangled economy can't last," said a third. "When it falls apart, liberty will march in."
Passive waiting is NOT a strategy. Nor even a good choice â€” if you want freedom in our lifetime.
You have to send out ships â€” if you want our ship to come in.
Do you know where the phrase "waiting for my ship to come in" came from?
In the 19th Century, English investors and entrepreneurs built huge sailing ships. It took months to build them, months to stock them with trading goods and provisions, and months to hire a good captain and crew.
Then these ships were launched to seek out foreign producers and traders. To exchange English goods for gold and silver and jewels, for silk and spices and other precious things.
Some of the ships hit reefs and sank. Others were destroyed by storms. Some were seized by pirates. Others mutinied â€” and went to Australia.
There were no shortwave radios. No telegraphs. No cell phones. No way to communicate with the ships until they returned to England.
"Waiting for my ship to come in" was coined by those who sent their ships out.
How many ships have you sent out? How many have you helped make ready to launch?
For our libertarian ships to come in, we must first send out many more seaworthy ships.
Have you acquired an Operation Politically Homeless (OPH) libertarian outreach kit for your local libertarian organization? OPH is a proven, tested way to discover new libertarian-leaning people and bring them into the liberty movement. That's one ship sent out.
If you're a student, the Advocates is giving OPH kits FREE to any campus libertarian organization that agrees to use them a minimum of three times in the coming year. Have you requested one for your campus group? That's a second ship sent out.
Have you volunteered to work at an OPH booth? That's a third ship sent out. (AND the most fun you can have with your clothes on.)
Have you forwarded thought-provoking articles from the Liberator Online to interested friends? That's a fourth ship launched.
Have you bought an Advocates book or product â€” say, Secrets of Libertarian Persuasion â€” for libertarian friends and acquaintances? For their birthdays? Or just because? That's a fifth ship. (And a handbook on "shipbuilding" for liberty.)
Work for liberty! Send out more and more ships. And you will stand a much better chance that YOUR libertarian ship will come in â€” and that you will have liberty in our lifetime.
Ask Dr. Ruwart
Dr. Mary Ruwart is a leading expert in libertarian communication. In this column she offers short answers to real questions about libertarianism. To submit questions to Dr. Ruwart, see end of column.
Who would make health decisions about children in a libertarian society: parents or medical professionals?
QUESTION: I just read about Boston Children's Hospital taking children away from their parents if they don't agree to treat their children the way the doctors recommend. Would this happen in a libertarian society?
MY SHORT ANSWER: In a libertarian society, a child's guardians, normally the parents, would decide whether the treatment was worth the risk. No treatment works for everyone and every treatment has side effects in some people. Parents might not always make the optimal decision for their child, but doctors won't always either. If the doctor feels strongly about a certain treatment, he or she should take the time to convince the parents of its worth, rather than use aggression to enforce their recommendation.
The article you cited indicated that children are taken from their parents most frequently "when doctors diagnose the child with a psychiatric disease, but the parents think the condition is a physical one." Mental problems can be caused by physical factors, such as diet, genetic abnormalities, and certain vitamin deficiencies, which blur the distinction between psychiatric and physical. These factors are often downplayed or totally ignored in physician training. Licensing boards determine the medical school curriculum and reinforce the status quo, rather than cutting-edge or "politically incorrect" knowledge. Emphasis is placed on drug treatment instead of prevention or nutritional therapy, primarily due to FDA regulations. Since children often respond more negatively to psychiatric drugs than adults, forcing children to take them can actually be detrimental.
In a libertarian society, medical practice would be more diverse, since doctors would be certified instead of licensed and prevention wouldn't be hampered by FDA regulations. Consequently, our medical science would be more advanced. In a society accustomed to using persuasion, rather than coercion, parents are likely to become better informed by doctors and make the best decision for their children.
* * *
Got questions? Dr. Ruwart has answers! If you'd like answers to YOUR tough questions on libertarian issues, email Dr. Ruwart
Due to volume, Dr. Ruwart can't personally acknowledge all emails. But we'll run the best questions and answers in upcoming issues.
Dr. Ruwart's previous Liberator Online answers are archived in searchable form.
Dr. Ruwart's latest book Short Answers to the Tough Questions, Expanded Edition is available from the Advocates, as is her acclaimed classic Healing Our World.
One-Minute Liberty Tip
by Sharon Harris
Word Choices: Pro-Market, Not Pro-Business
Libertarians enormously appreciate the positive contributions so many businesses have made to our world.
Because of this, libertarians are sometimes labeled "pro-business."
But this is incorrect â€” and misleading.
Libertarians are not "pro-business." We are "pro-market" â€” a very different thing.
The distinction is a vital one.
Libertarians support a free market where businesses are free to enter a field and offer their goods and services, in competition with any and all others who wish to do the same.
The resulting competition brings ever-better goods and services. Lower prices. Innovation. More convenience and more choice.
The companies that succeed in this free market competition do so by doing the best job of pleasing customers. Those that fail to sufficiently please consumers go out of business. The consumer is king.
This is the market process that libertarians strongly support.
But being "pro-business" is an entirely different thing. Politicians, lobbyists, economists, pundits and others who are pro-business â€” or who favor a particular business entity â€” may lobby for special favors for a particular business or area of commerce.
This may be pro-business. But it is anti-market.
Many who are pro-business want government to help particular businesses or industries that are unable to compete effectively. Sometimes they want government to use political power and tax dollars to entice a business to locate in a particular area.
Pro-business forces may want to prop up a favored business with bailouts of tax dollars or with other tax grants. They often call for punitive taxes on competition that challenges the favored business (especially if that competition is foreign). They may offer special zoning privileges to favored businesses. They may call on the government to seize private property through eminent domain and give it to a favored business.
Pro-business forces may endorse licensing, education requirements, regulations and other obstacles that protect favored businesses from competition. It often surprises people to learn that many large businesses love government regulation because it limits their competition. But as Nobel Prize winning economist George Stigler wrote: "â€¦as a rule, regulation is acquired by the industry and is designed and operated primarily for its benefit."
Governments may declare a business is "too big to fail" and thus deserves a huge taxpayer bailout. Or that a field is crucial to the "public interest," and thus deserving of subsidies and special treatment; agriculture is a prime example.
You get the picture. All of this is done by pro-business people. And all of it is deeply, profoundly, anti-market.
In an excellent article on this topic, "'Free Market' Doesn't Mean 'Pro-Business'" economist Art Carden quotes a great passage from the book The Rational Optimist by Matt Ridley:
"I hold no brief for large corporations, whose inefficiencies, complacencies, and anti-competitive tendencies often drive me as crazy as the next man. Like Milton Friedman, I notice that 'business corporations in general are not defenders of free enterprise. On the contrary, they are one of the chief sources of danger.' They are addicted to corporate welfare, they love regulations that erect barriers to entry to their small competitors, they yearn for monopoly and they grow flabby and inefficient with age."
The fruits of the pro-business mindset â€” taxes, unfairness, lack of competition and choice, over-priced goods and services, unemployment â€” are often the things that people hate most about our economic system. People naturally blame this on free enterprise, on the market system. Yet it is the pro-business mindset â€” not the market â€” that is responsible for these ills.
Let me give Art Carden the (almost) final word:
"In a free market, you are welcome, and indeed encouraged, to enter the mousetrap industry if you think you can build a better mousetrap or find a way to make similar mousetraps more efficiently. The other side of that coin is that you will be encouraged to leave the mousetrap industry if it turns out that your mousetraps are not better, but inferior.
"A 'free market' agenda is not the same thing as a 'pro business' agenda. Businesses should not be protected from competition, losses, and bankruptcy when they fail to deliver for the customer. All three are essential to truly free markets and free enterprise."
Don't use the label "pro-business." And politely but firmly reject it if someone attempts to label you that way. Respond that you are pro-market, not pro-business. And explain the difference.
* * * * * *
Sharon Harris is president of the Advocates for Self-Government.
What's Happening with the Advocates
ADVOCATES LIBERTARIAN COMMUNICATION EVENTS
Advocates President Sharon Harris will be speaking at the following events:
June 26: Communication workshop at Libertarian State Leadership Alliance (LSLA) training, Columbus, Ohio.
June 27-29: National Libertarian Party convention. The Advocates will have a booth, and Sharon will be speaking.
August 8-9: Featured speaker at the Foundation for Economic Education (FEE)'s "Communicating Liberty" conference.
Attendees will learn how to dramatically increase their effectiveness at communicating the ideas of liberty.
Email us now if you'd like us to send you further information on these events.
Email Sharon to find out how you can have a communication event near you.
FREE OPH KITS FOR LIBERTARIAN STUDENT GROUPS: Thanks to the generosity of our supporters, we're giving our acclaimed OPH (Operation Political Homeless) outreach kits to libertarian student groups FREE â€” if they simply promise to use them a minimum of three times a year and send us photos documenting their OPH activity. OPH â€” praised as the best recruiting tool in the libertarian movement â€” normally sells for $50.00.
If you're in a student libertarian group, click here for more information on getting your free OPH kit.
JOIN US ON TWITTER: Twitter is the first place to learn about breaking Advocates and liberty movement news, expert communications tips, and exclusive Advocates discounts and specials. (And don't worry â€” we won't bombard you with tweets. We're keeping it fun, fast, and useful.)
Go to the Advocates Twitter account and click the "follow" button below our picture. Thanks!
JOIN THE ADVOCATES ON FACEBOOK: The Advocates Facebook page offers you a chance to share your ideas on liberty, meet some great people and show your support for the Advocates for Self-Government and liberty. Join us and you'll receive regular Facebook updates on Advocates news, communication tips, and special offers for our Facebook friends.
2014 FREEDOM CRUISES: Advocates Board member and long-time libertarian leader Dr. Ken Bisson invites you to join him for a Freedom Cruise. Enjoy a wonderful trip on a luxury cruiser â€” at a bargain rate! Great food and fine company. Non-libertarians welcome! (These aren't Advocates events, but libertarians who have been on past cruises rave about them.) For photos and more details â€” or to sign up for free, no-pressure, no-commitment email updates â€” visit Freedom Cruises.