Copy
Welcome to E.L. Achieve’s eNewsletter! We hope this information inspires and enhances your professional practice to support English learner achievement.
View this email in your browser
Explicit Language Instruction:
Why does it matter if students understand how English works?
While the Common Core English Language Arts Standards do not prescribe specific instructional approaches, there are several key shifts that have significant implications for classroom practice.
  • With a focus on reading increasingly complex texts, students must learn to respond to questions based not on factual recall, but rather on the relationships among ideas and between different texts, and on their interpretation of those texts.
  • Learning to use evidence from text and their own experiences, students must articulate their thinking to demonstrate a depth of understanding, research skills, and analysis.
  • The emphasis on gaining knowledge through higher-order thinking skills means that providing a brief written response or selecting a correct answer from a list of options is no longer sufficient to demonstrate learning.
Each of these shifts has a critical point in common: a lot of language is needed to accomplish the work. To successfully meet academic demands, English learners need an internalized knowledge of written and spoken English – the ability to confidently and adroitly make skillful language choices to express their thinking.

What’s language got to do with it?

English learners acquire a great deal of English knowledge from a natural process of language learning during daily experiences. They have gleaned some important vocabulary, grammatical structures, conventions, and rules of discourse from everyday interactions. They might appear fluent. However, while they may have internalized certain complex verb forms, they may consistently misuse others. These students may lack knowledge of precise vocabulary for fairly common objects, such as countertop, high-rise, or pedal.
 
Much of our native language learning happens effortlessly – and almost invisibly. It is only when we manipulate a new language, or academic aspects of our first language, that some of these complexities emerge.

Students learning English as a second language must learn every word and sentence combination that native speakers of Standard English have spent thousands of hours internalizing during their early childhoods. This must be done in a condensed time frame, and often only during the hours a student is in school. Additionally, English learners must learn the content language being taught in their reading and writing materials. This includes not only the conceptual and concrete language taught in the current year, but also the foundational vocabulary taught in each previous year.

Consider what it takes to learn abstract concepts such as plot, ideas such as loyalty, and skills such as evaluate evidence or make an argument in a second language. English is particularly rich in idioms and figurative language with hundreds of expressions, such as know the ropes or put your best foot forward, which pepper the everyday speech, literature, and informational text that English learners must decipher.

As students progress through the grades, language demands increase rapidly. Sentence constructions are longer and more complex, and vocabulary is less concrete. Problems in reading and writing in the higher grades often stem from limited vocabulary and syntactic knowledge of English (García, 2000). Without a deep understanding of English, students are constrained academically, resulting in frustration for both themselves and their teachers. This can be especially problematic for long-term English learners who have attended U.S. schools for years, appear to be acculturated, and are comfortable using English in most settings. On the surface, these students do not seem to need specific language instruction. However, their verbal fluency often masks their instructional needs.
 
What’s often missing from English learner programs?

Despite the clear evidence that language knowledge affects academic and social success, we encounter a great deal of reluctance to focus on language learning.
 
Sheltered instruction has long held sway in teacher preparation for teaching English learners and professional development (cf. Echevarria, Vogt, & Short, 2000; Díaz-Rico & Weed, 2002). This approach emphasizes critical elements that are fundamental for student learning – including the use of comprehensible input techniques along with effective teaching strategies, such as accessing prior knowledge, establishing relevance, and ensuring content instruction is clear, sequential, and scaffolded. Yet this is not enough.

Current research strongly suggests that a more comprehensive model is needed. The literature makes clear that explicit instruction in English and how it works – vocabulary, word usage, grammatical features, and syntactical structures – must be included (Saunders, Foorman, & Carlson, 2006; Olsen, 2010; Coleman & Goldenberg, 2012; Dutro & Moran, 2003). By alluding to language use rather than explicitly sharing our knowledge of how the language works, we end up leaving English learners with a partial command of the structures of academic English.

It is up to us to do the hard work of learning how to equip English learners with the advanced uses of English required in academic tasks. Unfortunately, because much professional development is generally silent on the role of explicit language instruction, teachers are rarely provided support in teaching the language students need to be successful.

In the graphic below, we propose a Blueprint for Serving English Learners that adds this missing piece. It is a research-based and federally compliant model that ensures English learners receive explicit language instruction throughout the school day for two related, but distinct, purposes:
  • Integrated English language development within content instruction (Constructing Meaning), and
  • Dedicated ELD (Systematic ELD) to grow students’ proficiency in English.
Each component of the instructional blueprint is essential to a well-designed program for English learners. Neither is sufficient on its own: dedicated or Systematic ELD instruction supports success in content areas by strengthening language skills, but by itself it will not ensure meaningful access to the curriculum. Integrated ELD, or Constructing Meaning, does not provide sufficient language instruction to ensure a solid foundation because it does not follow a scope and sequence of language skills and may leave gaps in language knowledge.

To meet the needs of the English learners they serve, our partner districts apply the Blueprint for Serving English Learners to their program design. To learn more about the language growth and academic success of their students, visit our Promising Results page.

 
References
Coleman, R., & Goldenberg, C. (2012). The Common Core challenges for English language learners. Principal Leadership (February), 46–51.

Díaz-Rico, L. T., & Weed, K. Z. (2002). The crosscultural, language, and academic development handbook: A complete K–12 reference guide. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Dutro, S., & Moran, C. (2003). Rethinking English language instruction: An architectural approach. In G. G. García (Ed.), English learners: Reaching the highest level of English literacy (pp. 227–258). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Echevarria, J., Vogt, M. E., & Short, D. J. (2000). Making content comprehensible for English language learners. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

García, G. E. (2000). Bilingual children’s reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Vol. 3, 813–834. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Olsen, L. (2010). Reparable harm: Fulfilling the unkept promise of educational opportunity for California’s long term English learners. Long Beach, CA: Californians Together.

Saunders, W. M., Foorman, B. R., & Carlson, C. D. (2006). Is a separate block of time for oral English language development in programs for English learners needed? Elementary School Journal, 107(2), 181–198.
• Explicit Language
   Instruction
• Summer Leadership
   Seminars
• Drafting Template for
   Summary

• From the Blog:
  Talking Stick and
  Lines of Communication

• Congratulations,
   Kevin Topolski!
Visit us on Facebook
Visit us on Twitter
Visit our website
Summer Leadership Seminars

The purpose of the five-day Leadership Seminar is for partner districts to build capacity for effective initiatives. The three-day administrator strand (Wednesday–Friday of each seminar week) prepares principals, coordinators, directors, and other administrators to successfully lead district implementation. 
 
June 8-12: Rogers, AR
 
June 15-19:
• San Jose, CA
• Denver, CO (Elementary Systematic ELD only)
 
July 27-31:
• Springdale, AR (Secondary CM only)
• Orange County, CA (Elementary Systematic ELD only)

August 3-7: Portland, OR
 
Visit our website for information and registration.
 
Drafting Template for Summary

Students who can consolidate and summarize information are demonstrating advanced language proficiency. At the heart of an effective summary is the ability to engage in a process of selecting and reducing language. To complete this process, students must have confidence in their ability to make judgments about what they read and learn. We need to build this confidence in our English learners by providing tools that teach them how to sort, synthesize, and simplify complex academic language.
 
The Secondary Constructing Meaning Drafting Template Poster for Single-Paragraph Summary provides scaffolded instruction in summarizing. The poster is a valuable classroom tool that fosters discussion in pairs or small groups and prepares students to identify a main idea, determine essential details, and write a summary.
 
Visit our website for more information and to order the Drafting Template Poster.
In our series on Student Interaction Routines, two new blogs describe routines that
give students plenty of “miles on the tongue.”

Every Voice Is Heard: Talking Stick
How can teachers encourage reluctant speakers to participate in class? Talking Stick is a straightforward, small-group routine that ensures all student voices will be heard. This routine is a great choice when students need to build fluency or are struggling with high-leverage language.


Talking by Design: Lines of Communication
This whole-class routine provides multiple opportunities for language production with various partner combinations. It can be structured to practice asking and answering questions, building on others’ ideas, or reviewing tricky language patterns.
Congratulations, Kevin Topolski!
We applaud Kevin Topolski for winning the OnPoint Excellence in Education Award! Kevin is a 6th grade Reading and Writing teacher at Ron Russell Middle School in Oregon’s David Douglas School District. From hundreds of nominees, Kevin was chosen for inspiring creativity and enthusiasm in the classroom, demonstrating exemplary teaching methods, and having a significant impact on students, parents, and peers. Kevin is a district Constructing Meaning Key Trainer and has hosted multiple Lab Classrooms for district teachers to visit his classroom and reflect on effective strategies that engage students. Here’s a quote from his nomination packet: “Kevin Topolski’s classroom stands out as exceptionally vibrant, innovative, and inspiring. Kevin teaches in Multnomah County’s lowest income middle school, but you wouldn’t know that if you visited his room. You would find yourself surrounded by young leaders engaged in critical thinking, challenging problem solving and collaborative discourse.”

 
  Share on Facebook |   Tweet | Forward to a friend 

© 2015. All content copyright by E.L. Achieve. All Rights Reserved.
You are receiving this email because you subscribed on E.L. Achieve’s website.

Our mailing address is:
30332 Esperanza, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
www.elachieve.org


unsubscribe from this list | update subscription preferences